Showing posts with label funnies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label funnies. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 01, 2026

Because YOU Demanded It! Nibbling Around the Edges of Captain Carrot and His Amazing Zoo Crew (in 2026)

Home sick today, I thought to revisit a paper bag on the shelf, which turned out to contain a pile of comics I couldn't resist a couple months back. Reading these gently funny, harshly punny, books is a good use of a sick hour, if you have any affection for the conventions of VERY early 80s team superhero comics. What stuck out to me, though, was less fewer the mainline story or character elements and more the now-weird artifacts of comic books circa 1981. An example might be "do comic book panels need backgrounds Y/N".

Okay one thing I'm embarrassed to admit is that only this time did I get the joke that Yankee Poodle and Alley-Kat-Abra are fighting because ... they're a cat and dog. Duh. Hope you like that "Crashing Boars" joke, because it shows up in each of the first four issues, I think.

Also I remember at the time (roughly 1986 when I was reading this, so already in cheapo scavenged back issues) thinking Yankee Poodle was the better of these two characters, but I think now the clear creator fave is Alley-Kat-Abra, who gets most of the best lines—like such as "Pipe me aboard, Captain."—in addition to being the one all the boy characters like.

Sometimes your colorist maybe is thinking about something else.

I assume the letterer here had some beef with the great Scott Shaw! and denied him his bang deliberately. Of note: I have never seen this letterer's name anywhere else, ever. As the oldest aphorism in funny-animal comics has it, when you mess with Scott Shaw!, you best dig two graves, one for your top half, and one for your bottom half.

These ads are incredible.

This house ad is also incredible, at least for the last couple lines. I genuinely didn't know Detective Comics Comics had this degree of a sense of humor.

Was everybody liking this? No, not everybody was liking this.

You know, comic books. For kids.

With ... jokes like kids like, about production techniques and references to artists from 40 years before.

It's interesting to me that the main characters are drawn with so much less loving care and fun than this throwaway movie-director character, with a series of pretty good hat jokes and an absolutely perfect Three-Stooges-take panel. If there is any justice in the world, the next time you see me, I'll be wearing this "AUTEUR" hat. Also is it me or is "PERSON" in the context of a world where everyone is a non-human talking animal kind of fucked up?

I'm actually angry they missed the "fowl-up" joke here. They're birds FFS do I have to think of everything around here?

Also angry about what an incomprehensibly awful thing this is to say, in context. Look at the below, but only if you have a strong, strong stomach.

Okay this is the last chance—turn back close tab NOW if you want to keep thinking of Pig-Iron as a loveable goof, rather than a cruelly taunting predator.

Jesus god, man, you're talking to a duck! Do NOT talk about cooking eggs on your body and eating them!!!

Tuesday, September 01, 2020

How to Cartoon for Comedy Comma Perfectly

OR:
Fair Use for Fun, for Fun Games, and for Absolutely No Profit

Cartooning is like sculpture: an art of subtraction. By ruthlessly but correctly removing all extraneous elements, this simple blend of text and image can be transcendent, can encompass and convey virtually anything a mind can conceive, with nothing more than lines on paper.

Best of all, cartooning can be very, very funny. Humor can be many things! Mostly humor is thought of as (a type of) an unexpected juxtaposition, though certainly not every juxtaposition is funny, nor are all surprises funny. (Nor is it entirely clear that all funny things will have an unexpected juxtaposition! Theory work is pretty difficult, it turns out.) Nevertheless, it's safe to say that we can expect most funny things to have an element of unexpected juxtaposition. Henri Bergson described humor as the "mechanical encrusted upon the living," which is my favorite definition, because it is so stoned that it is itself funny. Also "encrustation" is a pretty funny word / concept.

When seeking to surprise and delight and amuse—that is, to provide humor—by means of a cartoon, specifically, it is well to break the whole down to its constituent parts. If the cartoon be composed of text and image, then should both the text in isolation and the image as (a) standalone sans texty companion be funny.

Let's examine an example.

Here is a standard—indeed classic—format: three panels, read in order, left to right. Note here that I am using "read" in a metaphoric sense, as there are no words to be read at all! No, merely three images in sequence. Or, more accurately: three funny images in a funny sequence. Bask in the humor. This ... this is a funny cartoon, all by itself.

(When the images are this funny, you really don't even need any text.)

Imbibe the words, next. We see with no ambiguity or uncertainty that, just as with the images, these words are very, very funny words.

(Why even sully text this funny with images?)

We would expect the combination of these words and this text to be funny, even if that combination (read: juxtaposition) is not unexpected [mind-blown emoji]! Just for the sake of completeness, though, let's review the combination.

(Wallow in the perfected comedic whole.)

Remember: funny is as funny does. When you want to create and endure humor, attend to each aspect as though that aspect alone would to carry the entire success solamente, even as, when you attempt cookery, you ensure the flavor of the dish complete is in every ingredient separately. Or, if you have less time, just rip off this cartoon, because it's truly funny stuff.

Couple references: https://iep.utm.edu/humor/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humor_in_Freud
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/humor/.

Monday, April 10, 2017