Any doubts I’ve had
about the ability for older filmmakers to deliver works possessing the vitality
found earlier in their careers are gone. My bias began recently when Tarantino
said he would retire after his tenth film and he doesn’t want to be an old man
making movies. And the more I thought about it the more I realized directors’
later works do indeed decline in quality.
But I finally became convinced that old
men can sometimes make their best work late in life. In cinema, there are no
rules and there are always exceptions. My favorite Buñuel films are Viridiana (1961), The Exterminating Angel (1962), Belle
de Jour (1967) and The Discrete Charm
of the Bourgeoisie (1972), which were all made toward the end of his
career. Malick’s anti-plot phase didn’t begin until he was in his late
sixties with The Tree of Life (2011).
And now Scorsese shows once and for all that I have all the proof I need.
The Irishman (2019,
Martin Scorsese) is a mob epic that delves into the legend of Jimmy Hoffa.
Combining the crime genre with a hint of history has always drawn me to the
novels of James Ellroy. And as David Thomson points out the most fascinating
parts of JFK (1991, Oliver Stone) are
the scenes of the “lurid gay underworld.” But neither come close to mining the
richness of Hoffa’s life.
What excited me about the premise of The Irishman beyond the popular rumors
that I’ve grown up with surrounding the disappearance of Hoffa, was his role in
the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and alleged ties to organized crime—ambitious
territory for a screenwriter and director to tackle. But they succeeded. The political intrigues and portrayal deliver, and HOFFA’S (Al Pacino) “If
you have it, a truck brought it to you” speech is incendiary. I left the movie theater exhilarated today
after everything The Irishman did for
me as a viewer.
Does it live up to Goodfellas (1990) and Casino
(1995) though? Easily. Not only does The
Irishman show the expertise, refinement, and calm of Scorsese as a
filmmaker not found in those earlier crime operas; and not only is its cast all
close to pushing 80; but, the characters are older men whose lives are anchored
in a perspective that they only attain toward the end of their lives. And
Zaillian’s screenplay gives us the intricate web of conspiracies in a ratio
perfectly in balance with the development of the ensemble of characters.
You often hear talk of modern movies being
faster to cater to shorter attention spans. I’m not sure if I find truth in
that. While The Irishman blew by me
despite its three and a half hour running time, I often thought about how at
times it felt slow, in a good way, or classically and confidently eased by at
times. Especially the climax: I didn’t look at my watch or get out of my seat
once, but I sensed it approaching, and as it did I felt a tranquil euphoria and
thought it was as though the plot smoothly glided by like one of the large
bodied lead sled domestic ‘70s autos often seen throughout the film. (Yet I was
on the edge of my seat at the same time, contrarily in suspense not knowing
what was about to happen.)
And Goodfellas
was already displaying a rapid jumpy wired on coke narrative with voiceover,
flashbacks, freeze-frames, and chronological deconstruction as types of its
screen vocabulary that I’d grown up with. So no, I don’t think movies have
gotten faster? The Irishman utilizes
several of those techniques, like voiceover, flashbacks, and especially
cutaways that make me hopeful it will connect with a younger audience. Another
thing I enjoy immensely in The Irishman
is its staggering amount of locations and how quickly we jump all over the
place geographically and chronologically throughout the story.
Another motif I spotted occurring often is
narrative repetition. Paul Schrader describes Bresson’s use of “doubling” (or
tripling) in Pickpocket (1959, Robert
Bresson) citing the scene where MICHEL writes in his journal “I went into the hall of a large bank,” and
says through v.o. “I went into the hall of a large bank,” while we then see him
go into the hall of a large bank. This occurs several times in The Irishman, with, for example in a
scene where FRANK SHEERAN (Robert De Niro) speaks in v.o. saying: “Whenever anybody says they're a little concerned it means they’re very concerned,” as a man
sitting across from him says “I’m a little concerned.” Then the man says he's very concerned. Frank goes on to say “and
when somebody says he's very concerned, he’s desperate.” Schrader says
this is “contrary… to normal film language,” but with Scorsese there’s a
comedic dimension that’s added. This technique was likely cultivated to its
apex in Casino with the scene where
Pesci’s character says something about these “guys back home,” in v.o., on top
of us seeing these guys back home, and on screen text that reads “back home.”
It’s really funny and The Irishman
knows it.
Also like Goodfellas and Casino, The Irishman is a jukeboxical—but most
of its playlist is confined within the end of the first half of the twentieth
century. And The Irishman’s songs
also display Scorsese’s theme of maturity with their nostalgic, soft,
sentimental romantic beauty and tone.
Something else that gets praise from me in
The Irishman as a sign of maturity or
wisdom that comes with age is not only its restraint and refinement of its mise
en scène and songs used in its soundtrack, but in a sense the way it replaces
the rampant coke binges and wild sex of Goodfellas
and Casino with more of a family
ethic and sense of loyalty. Does that make me sound square? I mean I applaud Scorsese for not just
churning out the same formula.
There is so much more Scorsese improves
upon with The Irishman. The goombah slang
is plentiful and makes for an authentic genre entry—like when Frank suggests
using “candy.” But it’s all here: the violence, the f-word, cars, the
restaurant and nightclub sets, the suits, pinky rings, the hairdos, and maybe
most of all, the eyewear. Nobody’s got nuttin on Scorsese when it comes to thick
framed bifocals, sunglasses, or gradient lenses.
In closing I can’t remember the last time
I’ve been more excited seeing a cast make their appearances on screen: Robert
De Niro and Joe Pesci are magic, Scorsese manages to keep Pacino from verging
into farce while instead getting a simmering, committed performance, Harvey
Keitel, and hundreds of supporting actors (and even bg have an intriguing look
in Scorsese’s Philly). Yep I really love The
Irishman.
No comments:
Post a Comment